Technique / Cell Biology / Cell culture / Cell culture contamination

BACKGROUND: Storing ovarian tissue for fertility preservation in cancer patients carries the risk of the presence of malignant cells that could lead to recurrence of cancer after reimplantation. Methods to exclude presence of cancer cells were used to improve the safety of cryopreservation-reimplantation procedures. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with hematological malignancies were referred for the storage of ovarian tissue for fertility preservation. Investigation included preoperative imaging and histological evaluation of fresh ovarian tissue. After thawing markers to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) were used and compared with patient's disease used as positive control (five patients). RESULTS: Preoperative imaging detected disease in the ovaries (two patients). Conventional histology post-tissue harvesting did not disclose malignant cells (56 patients). MRD results post-thawing were negative in Hodgkin's disease (CD30 immunohistochemical staining), in T- and B-cell lymphoma (PCR for T-cell receptor and Ig clones, respectively) and in two chronic myelogenous leukemia patients (RT-PCR for BCR-ABL gene expression). However, highly sensitive real-time RT-PCR was positive in one CML patient and, this alarming result avoided tissue transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative imaging prevented operations and storage of tissue with cancer. Evaluation of stored ovarian tissue for MRD using sensitive markers is essential to increase safety and to prevent reimplantation of tissue with malignant cells.

To evaluate the clinical impact of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma, apheretic products from 51 autotransplanted patients were tested by fluorescent (GeneScan) polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Sixty-nine per cent of harvests were contaminated when evaluated for IgH rearrangement. Forty-six patients responded to transplant, with 52.9% achieving complete response (CR). The clinical response of patients was significantly influenced by the number of re-infused CD34+ cells. Positive PCR results of re-infused harvests were not significantly related to patient outcome. Median overall survival (OS) was 33 months, and a significant advantage for patients transplanted by 12 months from diagnosis was observed. Moreover, OS was longer for patients receiving PCR-negative stem cells, with 72% of patients surviving to 70 months in the group receiving PCR-negative harvests vs 48% in the group transplanted with contaminated precursors (not statistically significant). Ex vivo purging caused a reduction of contamination of up to 3 logs; nevertheless, 80% of purged harvests remained PCR-positive and the purging procedure did not alter response or survival rates. Thus, the failure of a predictive role for this highly sensitive molecular method could be explained by the assumption that in vivo persisting malignant cells are the true source of relapse in MM.

The incidence and clinical relevance of tumor cells contaminating the stem cell products of patients with advanced breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy is uncertain because prior studies used small sample sizes and lacked standardization of the immunocytochemistry (ICC) detection method used. We evaluated blood stem cell and bone marrow samples obtained from 535 women with metastatic breast cancer who received high-dose chemotherapy and unmanipulated mobilized blood stem cell support. Of the patients tested, 20.6% and 26.3% had blood stem cell and bone marrow contamination, respectively. Blood stem cell contamination was significantly more frequent in patients with marrow involvement than in patients without marrow involvement (35% versus 18.4%, respectively; P = .009). In fact, according to multivariate analysis results, marrow involvement was the only significant predictor for blood stem cell product contamination. Patients without marrow involvement who had fewer apheresis procedures were also observed to have a significantly lower incidence rate of blood stem cell contamination than patients who had more procedures (P < or = .008), and patients who received combined chemotherapy and cytokine mobilization therapy had less contamination than patients who received cytokine alone (P = .0001). Combined mobilization therapy appears to be associated with a lower incidence of contamination as a result of fewer apheresis procedures rather than through an antitumor effect of chemotherapy (P < or = .001). Patients with ICC-negative blood stem cell products had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than did patients with ICC-positive blood stem cell products (median PFS, 401 versus 291 days, respectively, P = .007; median OS, 1060 versus 697 days, P = .009) . However, multivariate analysis did not reveal any significant independent predictors of survival outcomes. Thus, further study is needed to determine if contaminating tumor cells in the stem cell products of breast cancer patients ever directly impact survival outcomes or are only indicative of residual in vivo disease in high-dose chemotherapy recipients.