 | |
By: Bruce James Brew ISBN: 0195133633 Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA Release Date: 15 March, 2001 Bioscience book rank: 1574439
| This book gives a very good over view of HIV neurology by a respected neurologist in this field. I would recommend it to any health care worker who helps people living with HIV. I like the fact it is written by one author as this makes the text more coherent than a multi-authored work which are so common these days. It is a clear and well written book. |
 | |
By: Michele Tracy Berger ISBN: 0691127700 Publisher: Princeton University Press Release Date: 03 July, 2006 Bioscience book rank: 526686
| |
 | |
By: K.P. Smith, S.C. Watkins ISBN: Publisher: Elsevier Release Date: Bioscience book rank: 1090456
| |
 | |
By: Allen G. Rodrigo, Gerald H. Learn Jr. ISBN: 0792379942 Publisher: Springer Release Date: 31 October, 2000 Bioscience book rank: 1088902
| |
 | |
By: Nancy Goldstein, Jennifer Manlowe ISBN: 0814730930 Publisher: NYU Press Release Date: 01 June, 1997 Bioscience book rank: 996148
| I have yet to read this text but am definitely looking forward to it. It is about time the issue of women's health and HIV/AIDs issues were addressed. Finally |
 | |
By: David Scondras, Dede Ketover ISBN: 079108552X Publisher: Chelsea House Publications Release Date: 30 March, 2008 Bioscience book rank: 429710
| |
 | |
By: Jonathan Morgan ISBN: 1919930353 Publisher: Double Storey Books Release Date: November, 2003 Bioscience book rank: 1104523
| |
 | |
By: Francisco Fernandez, Pedro Ruiz ISBN: 1582557136 Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Release Date: 01 April, 2006 Bioscience book rank: 1005779
| |
 | |
By: Liz Walker, Graeme Reid, Morna Cornell, AIDS in Context Conference (2001 University of the Witwatersrand) ISBN: 1588262634 Publisher: Lynne Rienner Publishers Release Date: March, 2004 Bioscience book rank: 578938
| |
 | |
By: Howard Libman, Harvey Makadon ISBN: 1930513739 Publisher: American College of Physicians Release Date: 01 June, 2007 Bioscience book rank: 1114787
| not a bad read, but too wordy. repeated itself multiple times. could have used half the text to explain the topic. |